EMF-The Dangers and How to Mitigate Risk
RF Safe recaps a Truth Expedition podcast episode featuring RF Safe founder John Coates discussing alleged biological risks from EMF exposure and arguing that current regulations lag behind modern science. The piece links EMFs to developmental and health concerns (including neural-tube defects and autism) via Coates’ proposed “S4–Mito–Spin” framework involving voltage-gated ion channels, mitochondrial signaling, and radical-pair/spin chemistry. It also promotes RF Safe’s research library, SAR comparison tools, and mitigation products as part of a risk-reduction approach.
Key points
- The article summarizes a podcast conversation asserting that non-ionizing EMFs may affect biology through mechanisms beyond tissue heating.
- Coates connects his advocacy to a personal history involving his daughter’s neural-tube defect and later exposure to embryo research he says suggested EMF-related anomalies.
- The “S4–Mito–Spin” framework claims EMFs can add “timing noise” to voltage-gated ion channels (S4), disrupt mitochondrial signaling, and influence radical-pair reactions (spin chemistry).
- The piece suggests potential downstream impacts in sensitive tissues (e.g., brain, heart, testes, pancreas, immune system) and mentions red blood cell “stacking/clumping” under certain RF conditions as a possible effect.
- It argues EMF policy and regulation have not kept pace with physics/biology and frames mitigation as necessary while policy catches up.
- RF Safe highlights its study library, SAR comparison tools, and products (e.g., TruthCase) intended to reduce user exposure.
Referenced studies & papers
Relevant papers in OpenMel
Source:
Open original
AI-generated summaries may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.
AI-generated summaries may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.
Comments
Log in to comment.
No comments yet.