Study of the effects of 50 Hz magnetic field on embryonic development: dependence on field level and field vector.
Abstract
We studied the influence of power frequency and vector of EMF on avian and mammalian embryogenesis at a high level of magnetic induction (10 mT professional exposures and using therapeutic devices of Czech provenance) and at a low level (6 microT-environmental occurrence). No significant alterations of either avian or mammalian embryogenesis were found after repeated exposures to 50 Hz MF at 10 mT or 6 microT, nor with different vectors.
AI evidence extraction
Main findings
Repeated exposures to 50 Hz magnetic fields at 10 mT (professional/therapeutic device-related) or 6 µT (environmental level) showed no significant alterations in avian or mammalian embryogenesis. No significant differences were found with different field vectors.
Outcomes measured
- Embryonic development/embryogenesis (avian)
- Embryonic development/embryogenesis (mammalian)
Limitations
- Sample size not reported in abstract
- Exposure duration and timing during development not specified in abstract
- Species/strain details not specified in abstract
- Outcome measures and assessment methods not described in abstract
Suggested hubs
-
occupational-exposure
(0.6) Mentions professional exposures at 10 mT.
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "animal",
"exposure": {
"band": "ELF",
"source": "occupational, therapeutic devices",
"frequency_mhz": 0.05000000000000000277555756156289135105907917022705078125,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "repeated exposures"
},
"population": "Avian and mammalian embryos",
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"Embryonic development/embryogenesis (avian)",
"Embryonic development/embryogenesis (mammalian)"
],
"main_findings": "Repeated exposures to 50 Hz magnetic fields at 10 mT (professional/therapeutic device-related) or 6 µT (environmental level) showed no significant alterations in avian or mammalian embryogenesis. No significant differences were found with different field vectors.",
"effect_direction": "no_effect",
"limitations": [
"Sample size not reported in abstract",
"Exposure duration and timing during development not specified in abstract",
"Species/strain details not specified in abstract",
"Outcome measures and assessment methods not described in abstract"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.7399999999999999911182158029987476766109466552734375,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"50 Hz",
"ELF magnetic field",
"power frequency",
"embryogenesis",
"embryonic development",
"avian",
"mammalian",
"field vector",
"10 mT",
"6 µT"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "occupational-exposure",
"weight": 0.59999999999999997779553950749686919152736663818359375,
"reason": "Mentions professional exposures at 10 mT."
}
]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.
Comments
Log in to comment.
No comments yet.