Unmasking the Hidden Dangers of Your Phone’s Invisible Waves
RF Safe argues that radiofrequency (RF) emissions from phones and Wi‑Fi pose non-thermal biological risks and that current safety limits are outdated. The post cites animal studies (including NTP and Ramazzini) and references WHO and IARC positions while promoting a proposed mechanism framework (“S4‑Mito‑Spin”) and calling for regulatory and policy changes. It also includes advocacy claims about regulatory capture and promotes RF Safe products and exposure-reduction practices.
Key points
- Claims decades of research show non-thermal RF/ELF effects, including developmental effects in chick embryos and tumors in rodent studies (NTP and Ramazzini).
- Asserts (without providing full citations in the excerpt) that WHO 2025 systematic reviews support animal carcinogenicity evidence and that IARC’s 2011 Group 2B classification is overdue for review.
- Presents the “S4‑Mito‑Spin” framework as an explanation for non-thermal mechanisms (ion channels, oxidative stress/ROS, radical-pair chemistry).
- Criticizes FCC RF exposure guidelines as outdated and references a 2021 U.S. Court of Appeals decision characterizing the FCC’s approach as inadequate regarding non-thermal evidence.
- Alleges industry influence (“corporate capture”) has slowed regulatory updates and calls for policy actions (e.g., changes to the 1996 Telecom Act Section 704).
- Includes personal narrative from RF Safe founder John Coates and promotes RF Safe/TruthCase (QuantaCase) and other technology concepts (e.g., Li‑Fi) as solutions to reduce exposure.
Referenced studies & papers
Relevant papers in OpenMel
Source:
Open original
AI-generated summaries may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.
AI-generated summaries may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.
Comments
Log in to comment.
No comments yet.