Share
𝕏 Facebook LinkedIn

Thermal and SAR-Based Limits for Human Skin Exposed to Terahertz Radiation

PAPER manual 2025 International Telecommunications Conference (ITC-Egypt) 2025 Engineering / measurement Effect: unclear Evidence: Low

Abstract

Category: Biophysics, Electromagnetic Safety Tags: terahertz radiation, human skin, SAR, thermal effects, safety guidelines, wireless communication, exposure limits DOI: 10.1109/itc-egypt66095.2025.11186625 URL: ieeexplore-ieee-org.libproxy.berkeley.edu Overview Terahertz technology is rapidly emerging as a key player in wireless communication and sensing, drawing increasing research attention. However, safety regulations have yet to fully encompass the entire terahertz spectrum, with current standards addressing only the sub-terahertz band (100-300GHz). Methods To address this gap, the authors developed a COMSOL Multiphysics model to: - Analyze the thermal impact of terahertz exposure on human skin - Determine maximum permissible power limits from 0.1 THz to 5 THz - Assess state-of-the-art terahertz wireless communication systems and evaluate related exposure safety Findings - The currently defined power levels for the sub-terahertz band are insufficient for both the sub-terahertz and broader terahertz regions. - COMSOL simulations demonstrated that keeping SAR below the accepted 1.6 W/kg threshold requires power densities under 0.226 W/m2, which yielded negligible increases in skin temperature. - Even at power densities as high as 100 W/m2, although the thermal effects were minimal (≈0.03 K), SAR values far exceeded recognized safety standards. - Temporal SAR analysis suggests that stricter limits could be necessary for prolonged exposure. Conclusions - This research provides the first comprehensive thermal and SAR-based safety analysis for human skin exposed to terahertz frequencies (0.1-5 THz). - Findings indicate that current sub-THz safety standards are not transferrable to the full terahertz spectrum, underscoring the urgent need for updated exposure guidelines. - Limitations include the frequency range (only up to 5 THz) and assumptions about uniform skin structure. - Future work: experimental phantom studies and expanded analysis of potential long-term biological impacts of terahertz radiation. ⚠️ There is a clear connection between terahertz electromagnetic fields and regulatory safety concerns relating to human health, particularly with respect to skin exposure and the inadequacy of current standards.

AI evidence extraction

At a glance
Study type
Engineering / measurement
Effect direction
unclear
Population
human skin (modeled)
Sample size
Exposure
terahertz wireless communication systems / terahertz exposure (modeled) · 1.6 W/kg
Evidence strength
Low
Confidence: 74% · Peer-reviewed: unknown

Main findings

Using COMSOL Multiphysics simulations for 0.1–5 THz exposure, the authors report that maintaining SAR below 1.6 W/kg corresponds to power densities under 0.226 W/m^2 and produces negligible skin temperature increases. They also report that at 100 W/m^2 thermal effects remain small (~0.03 K) but SAR exceeds recognized safety standards, and that temporal SAR analysis suggests stricter limits may be needed for prolonged exposure.

Outcomes measured

  • skin temperature change (thermal impact)
  • specific absorption rate (SAR)
  • maximum permissible power limits / power density thresholds

Limitations

  • Frequency range limited to 0.1–5 THz
  • Assumptions about uniform skin structure
  • Modeling/simulation study without experimental validation (future phantom studies proposed)

Suggested hubs

  • 5g-policy (0.55)
    Focuses on exposure limits/safety guidelines for very high-frequency wireless technologies (0.1–5 THz), relevant to next-generation communications policy discussions.
  • who-icnirp (0.6)
    Evaluates adequacy/transferability of existing safety standards and calls for updated exposure guidelines.
View raw extracted JSON
{
    "study_type": "engineering",
    "exposure": {
        "band": "terahertz",
        "source": "wireless communication systems / terahertz exposure (modeled)",
        "frequency_mhz": null,
        "sar_wkg": 1.600000000000000088817841970012523233890533447265625,
        "duration": null
    },
    "population": "human skin (modeled)",
    "sample_size": null,
    "outcomes": [
        "skin temperature change (thermal impact)",
        "specific absorption rate (SAR)",
        "maximum permissible power limits / power density thresholds"
    ],
    "main_findings": "Using COMSOL Multiphysics simulations for 0.1–5 THz exposure, the authors report that maintaining SAR below 1.6 W/kg corresponds to power densities under 0.226 W/m^2 and produces negligible skin temperature increases. They also report that at 100 W/m^2 thermal effects remain small (~0.03 K) but SAR exceeds recognized safety standards, and that temporal SAR analysis suggests stricter limits may be needed for prolonged exposure.",
    "effect_direction": "unclear",
    "limitations": [
        "Frequency range limited to 0.1–5 THz",
        "Assumptions about uniform skin structure",
        "Modeling/simulation study without experimental validation (future phantom studies proposed)"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "low",
    "confidence": 0.7399999999999999911182158029987476766109466552734375,
    "peer_reviewed_likely": "unknown",
    "keywords": [
        "terahertz radiation",
        "human skin",
        "SAR",
        "thermal effects",
        "safety guidelines",
        "wireless communication",
        "exposure limits",
        "COMSOL Multiphysics",
        "power density"
    ],
    "suggested_hubs": [
        {
            "slug": "5g-policy",
            "weight": 0.5500000000000000444089209850062616169452667236328125,
            "reason": "Focuses on exposure limits/safety guidelines for very high-frequency wireless technologies (0.1–5 THz), relevant to next-generation communications policy discussions."
        },
        {
            "slug": "who-icnirp",
            "weight": 0.59999999999999997779553950749686919152736663818359375,
            "reason": "Evaluates adequacy/transferability of existing safety standards and calls for updated exposure guidelines."
        }
    ]
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract/metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.

Comments

Log in to comment.

No comments yet.