Exploring edible bird nest's potential in mitigating Wi-Fi's impact on male reproductive health
Abstract
Exploring edible bird nest's potential in mitigating Wi-Fi's impact on male reproductive health Maluin SM, Jaffar FHF, Osman K, Zulkefli AF, Mat Ros MF, Ibrahim SF. Exploring edible bird nest's potential in mitigating Wi-Fi's impact on male reproductive health. Reprod Med Biol. 2024 Sep 11;23(1):e12606. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12606. Abstract Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the protective effects of edible bird nest (EBN) against the detrimental impact of Wi-Fi on male reproductive health. Specifically, it examines whether EBN can mitigate Wi-Fi-induced changes in male reproductive hormones, estrogen receptors (ER), spermatogenesis, and sperm parameters. Methods: Thirty-six adult male rats were divided into six groups (n = 6): Control, Control EBN, Control E2, Wi-Fi, Wi-Fi+EBN, and Wi-Fi+E2. Control EBN and Wi-Fi+EBN groups received 250 mg/kg/day EBN, while Control E2 and Wi-Fi+E2 groups received 12 μg/kg/day E2 for 10 days. Wi-Fi exposure and EBN supplementation lasted eight weeks. Assessments included organ weight, hormone levels (FSH, LH, testosterone, and E2), ERα/ERβ mRNA and protein expression, spermatogenic markers (c-KIT and SCF), and sperm quality. Results: Wi-Fi exposure led to decreased FSH, testosterone, ERα mRNA, and sperm quality (concentration, motility, and viability). EBN supplementation restored serum FSH and testosterone levels, increased serum LH levels, and the testosterone/E2 ratio, and normalized mRNA ERα expression. Additionally, EBN increased sperm concentration in Wi-Fi-exposed rats without affecting motility or viability. Conclusions: EBN plays a crucial role in regulating male reproductive hormones and spermatogenesis, leading to improved sperm concentration. This could notably benefit men experiencing oligospermia due to excessive Wi-Fi exposure. Excerpts Wi-Fi exposure setting: For Wi-Fi exposure, this study utilized the TP-LINK AC750 Wireless Dual Band Wi- Fi Router Archer C20 (Shenzhen, China). This router features three external antennas, emitting signals at a frequency of 2.45 GHz using the IEEE 802.11n standard. The router was positioned 20 cm away from the rat cages and constantly exchanged data with a Raspberry Pi device through a ping protocol.3 The router was selected for its minimal vibration and noise output, which is typical for standard Wi-Fi routers used in laboratory settings. Additionally, the rats were housed in a controlled environment designed to minimize external disturbances, ensuring the reliability of our findings related to Wi-Fi exposure effects on male reproductive health. Conclusion: This study highlights the negative impact of eight weeks of Wi-Fi exposure on sperm quality, including decreased concentration, motility, and viability, which can be ascribed to changes in male reproductive hormones. EBN supplementation appears to be a preventive intervention, significantly increasing gonadotrophin and testosterone levels, as well as sperm concentration in Wi-Fi-exposed rats, but not influencing sperm motility or viability. Furthermore, it increases the T/E2 ratio and restores estrogenic activity in the testes, resulting in enhanced sperm concentration. The study also reveals a discrepancy between the impacts of EBN supplementation and E2 treatment on sperm concentration in a Wi-Fi-exposed setting, emphasizing EBN's unique protective properties without adverse effects on male reproduction. In conclusion, EBN supplementation effectively restores spermatogenesis capabilities that are affected by Wi-Fi-induced damage. This is achieved through the modulation of male reproductive hormones, with a primary influence on sperm concentration. Nevertheless, further research is necessary to fully understand the mechanisms and establish safe usage limits for maximizing the benefits of EBN while minimizing potential risks. Open access paper: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
AI evidence extraction
Main findings
In rats, 8 weeks of 2.45 GHz Wi-Fi exposure decreased serum FSH and testosterone, reduced ERα mRNA expression, and decreased sperm quality (concentration, motility, viability). Edible bird nest (250 mg/kg/day) during Wi-Fi exposure restored FSH and testosterone, increased LH and the testosterone/E2 ratio, normalized ERα mRNA expression, and increased sperm concentration, but did not improve sperm motility or viability.
Outcomes measured
- Organ weight
- FSH
- LH
- Testosterone
- Estradiol (E2)
- Testosterone/E2 ratio
- ERα mRNA expression
- ERβ mRNA expression
- ERα/ERβ protein expression
- Spermatogenic markers (c-KIT, SCF)
- Sperm concentration
- Sperm motility
- Sperm viability
Limitations
- Animal study (rats), limiting direct generalizability to humans
- Small group sizes (n=6 per group)
- Exposure metric details such as SAR/power density not reported in the provided abstract/excerpt
- Intervention co-exposure design (EBN and E2 groups) may complicate attribution of effects solely to Wi-Fi exposure
Suggested hubs
-
school-wi-fi
(0.6) Study uses 2.45 GHz Wi‑Fi router exposure and assesses biological effects relevant to Wi‑Fi environments.
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "animal",
"exposure": {
"band": "RF",
"source": "wi-fi",
"frequency_mhz": 2450,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "8 weeks"
},
"population": "Adult male rats",
"sample_size": 36,
"outcomes": [
"Organ weight",
"FSH",
"LH",
"Testosterone",
"Estradiol (E2)",
"Testosterone/E2 ratio",
"ERα mRNA expression",
"ERβ mRNA expression",
"ERα/ERβ protein expression",
"Spermatogenic markers (c-KIT, SCF)",
"Sperm concentration",
"Sperm motility",
"Sperm viability"
],
"main_findings": "In rats, 8 weeks of 2.45 GHz Wi-Fi exposure decreased serum FSH and testosterone, reduced ERα mRNA expression, and decreased sperm quality (concentration, motility, viability). Edible bird nest (250 mg/kg/day) during Wi-Fi exposure restored FSH and testosterone, increased LH and the testosterone/E2 ratio, normalized ERα mRNA expression, and increased sperm concentration, but did not improve sperm motility or viability.",
"effect_direction": "mixed",
"limitations": [
"Animal study (rats), limiting direct generalizability to humans",
"Small group sizes (n=6 per group)",
"Exposure metric details such as SAR/power density not reported in the provided abstract/excerpt",
"Intervention co-exposure design (EBN and E2 groups) may complicate attribution of effects solely to Wi-Fi exposure"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.7800000000000000266453525910037569701671600341796875,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"Wi-Fi",
"2.45 GHz",
"RF exposure",
"male reproductive health",
"spermatogenesis",
"sperm quality",
"FSH",
"LH",
"testosterone",
"estradiol",
"estrogen receptor alpha",
"edible bird nest",
"rat"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "school-wi-fi",
"weight": 0.59999999999999997779553950749686919152736663818359375,
"reason": "Study uses 2.45 GHz Wi‑Fi router exposure and assesses biological effects relevant to Wi‑Fi environments."
}
]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.
Comments
Log in to comment.
No comments yet.