Mobile phones, cordless phones and the risk for brain tumours
Abstract
The Hardell-group conducted during 1997-2003 two case control studies on brain tumours including assessment of use of mobile phones and cordless phones. The questionnaire was answered by 905 (90%) cases with malignant brain tumours, 1,254 (88%) cases with benign tumours and 2,162 (89%) population-based controls. Cases were reported from the Swedish Cancer Registries. Anatomical area in the brain for the tumour was assessed and related to side of the head used for both types of wireless phones. In the current analysis we defined ipsilateral use (same side as the tumour) as >or=50% of the use and contralateral use (opposite side) as <50% of the calling time. We report now further results for use of mobile and cordless phones. Regarding astrocytoma we found highest risk for ipsilateral mobile phone use in the >10 year latency group, OR=3.3, 95% CI=2.0-5.4 and for cordless phone use OR=5.0, 95% CI=2.3-11. In total, the risk was highest for cases with first use <20 years age, for mobile phone OR=5.2, 95% CI=2.2-12 and for cordless phone OR=4.4, 95% CI=1.9-10. For acoustic neuroma, the highest OR was found for ipsilateral use and >10 year latency, for mobile phone OR=3.0, 95% CI=1.4-6.2 and cordless phone OR=2.3, 95% CI=0.6-8.8. Overall highest OR for mobile phone use was found in subjects with first use at age <20 years, OR=5.0, 95% CI 1.5-16 whereas no association was found for cordless phone in that group, but based on only one exposed case. The annual age-adjusted incidence of astrocytoma for the age group >19 years increased significantly by +2.16%, 95% CI +0.25 to +4.10 during 2000-2007 in Sweden in spite of seemingly underreporting of cases to the Swedish Cancer Registry. A decreasing incidence was found for acoustic neuroma during the same period. However, the medical diagnosis and treatment of this tumour type has changed during recent years and underreporting from a single center would have a large impact for such a rare tumour.
AI evidence extraction
Main findings
In two Swedish case-control studies, ipsilateral use of mobile and cordless phones was associated with higher odds of astrocytoma, especially with >10 years latency (mobile phone OR 3.3, 95% CI 2.0-5.4; cordless phone OR 5.0, 95% CI 2.3-11). For acoustic neuroma, the highest odds were reported for ipsilateral mobile phone use with >10 years latency (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.4-6.2), while the cordless phone estimate was imprecise (OR 2.3, 95% CI 0.6-8.8). Highest risks were also reported among subjects with first use before age 20 years.
Outcomes measured
- astrocytoma
- acoustic neuroma
- brain tumours
- tumour laterality relative to phone use side
- age-adjusted incidence of astrocytoma
- age-adjusted incidence of acoustic neuroma
Limitations
- Questionnaire-based exposure assessment
- Some subgroup estimates were based on small numbers
- Cordless phone result for acoustic neuroma included a confidence interval compatible with no association
- Incidence trend interpretation may be affected by underreporting to the Swedish Cancer Registry
- Changes in diagnosis and treatment may affect acoustic neuroma incidence trends
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "case_control",
"exposure": {
"band": "RF",
"source": "mobile phone, cordless phone",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": ">10 year latency; first use at age <20 years"
},
"population": "Swedish cases with malignant and benign brain tumours and population-based controls",
"sample_size": 4321,
"outcomes": [
"astrocytoma",
"acoustic neuroma",
"brain tumours",
"tumour laterality relative to phone use side",
"age-adjusted incidence of astrocytoma",
"age-adjusted incidence of acoustic neuroma"
],
"main_findings": "In two Swedish case-control studies, ipsilateral use of mobile and cordless phones was associated with higher odds of astrocytoma, especially with >10 years latency (mobile phone OR 3.3, 95% CI 2.0-5.4; cordless phone OR 5.0, 95% CI 2.3-11). For acoustic neuroma, the highest odds were reported for ipsilateral mobile phone use with >10 years latency (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.4-6.2), while the cordless phone estimate was imprecise (OR 2.3, 95% CI 0.6-8.8). Highest risks were also reported among subjects with first use before age 20 years.",
"effect_direction": "harm",
"limitations": [
"Questionnaire-based exposure assessment",
"Some subgroup estimates were based on small numbers",
"Cordless phone result for acoustic neuroma included a confidence interval compatible with no association",
"Incidence trend interpretation may be affected by underreporting to the Swedish Cancer Registry",
"Changes in diagnosis and treatment may affect acoustic neuroma incidence trends"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.93000000000000004884981308350688777863979339599609375,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"mobile phone",
"cordless phone",
"brain tumour",
"astrocytoma",
"acoustic neuroma",
"ipsilateral use",
"latency",
"case-control",
"Sweden"
],
"suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.
Comments
Log in to comment.
No comments yet.