Share
𝕏 Facebook LinkedIn

The relation of dose rate of microwave radiation to the time of death and total absorbed dose in the mouse.

PAPER pubmed The Journal of microwave power 1976 Animal study Effect: harm Evidence: Low

Abstract

This experiment demonstrates that for microwave radiation, absorbed dose determination alone is not dosimetrically sufficient. The average absorbed dose to death in this experiment increases as the rate of absorption decreases. This observation is not surprising since microwave energy produces heating of the biological tissues. Hence, with a higher rate of heating the body of an animal, the less it is able to retain homeostasis through metabolic regulation than with a lower rate of heating. The absorbed dose rate and the duration of exposure must both be determined in any microwave biological effects experiments.

AI evidence extraction

At a glance
Study type
Animal study
Effect direction
harm
Population
mouse
Sample size
Exposure
microwave
Evidence strength
Low
Confidence: 74% · Peer-reviewed: yes

Main findings

In mice exposed to microwave radiation, the average absorbed dose to death increased as the rate of absorption decreased, indicating that absorbed dose alone was not sufficient for dosimetry. The authors attribute this to tissue heating and reduced ability to maintain homeostasis at higher heating rates, and conclude that both absorbed dose rate and exposure duration should be determined in microwave bioeffects experiments.

Outcomes measured

  • time of death
  • total absorbed dose to death
  • absorbed dose rate (rate of absorption)
  • heating/thermoregulatory homeostasis

Limitations

  • No frequency, exposure setup/source, or quantitative dose-rate/duration details provided in the abstract.
  • Sample size and statistical methods are not reported in the abstract.
  • Findings are framed in terms of thermal effects; non-thermal effects are not addressed in the abstract.

Suggested hubs

  • occupational-exposure (0.15)
    Microwave exposure and dosimetry concepts may be relevant to occupational RF safety, though no occupational setting is described.
View raw extracted JSON
{
    "study_type": "animal",
    "exposure": {
        "band": "microwave",
        "source": null,
        "frequency_mhz": null,
        "sar_wkg": null,
        "duration": null
    },
    "population": "mouse",
    "sample_size": null,
    "outcomes": [
        "time of death",
        "total absorbed dose to death",
        "absorbed dose rate (rate of absorption)",
        "heating/thermoregulatory homeostasis"
    ],
    "main_findings": "In mice exposed to microwave radiation, the average absorbed dose to death increased as the rate of absorption decreased, indicating that absorbed dose alone was not sufficient for dosimetry. The authors attribute this to tissue heating and reduced ability to maintain homeostasis at higher heating rates, and conclude that both absorbed dose rate and exposure duration should be determined in microwave bioeffects experiments.",
    "effect_direction": "harm",
    "limitations": [
        "No frequency, exposure setup/source, or quantitative dose-rate/duration details provided in the abstract.",
        "Sample size and statistical methods are not reported in the abstract.",
        "Findings are framed in terms of thermal effects; non-thermal effects are not addressed in the abstract."
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "low",
    "confidence": 0.7399999999999999911182158029987476766109466552734375,
    "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
    "keywords": [
        "microwave radiation",
        "dose rate",
        "absorbed dose",
        "dosimetry",
        "thermal effects",
        "heating",
        "mouse",
        "time to death",
        "homeostasis"
    ],
    "suggested_hubs": [
        {
            "slug": "occupational-exposure",
            "weight": 0.1499999999999999944488848768742172978818416595458984375,
            "reason": "Microwave exposure and dosimetry concepts may be relevant to occupational RF safety, though no occupational setting is described."
        }
    ]
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract/metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.

Comments

Log in to comment.

No comments yet.