Nonionizing Electromagnetic Field: A Promising Alternative for Growing Control Yeast.
Abstract
In the food industry, some fungi are considered to be common spoilage microorganisms which reduce the shelf life of products. To avoid this outcome, different technologies are being developed to control their growth. Electromagnetic fields (EMF) have been used to combat bacterial growth, but there are few studies on yeasts and their possible action mechanisms. For this reason, we studied the effect of EMF between 1 to 5.9 GHz bands on the growth of yeast and observed that all the frequencies of the band used cause the reduction of the viability of this yeast. In addition, we observed that the distance between the antenna and the sample is an important factor to consider to control the growing yeast. By using transmission electron microscopy, we found that the EMF caused a loss of continuity of the yeast cell membrane. Therefore, EMF may be used as a control method for yeast growth.
AI evidence extraction
Main findings
Exposure to electromagnetic fields between 1 and 5.9 GHz reduced yeast viability across all tested frequencies. Transmission electron microscopy indicated loss of continuity of the yeast cell membrane, and distance between the antenna and sample influenced the effect.
Outcomes measured
- Yeast viability/growth
- Yeast cell membrane integrity (TEM)
Limitations
- Sample size not reported in abstract
- Exposure metrics (e.g., power density, SAR) not reported in abstract
- Exposure duration not reported in abstract
- Yeast species/strain not specified in abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "other",
"exposure": {
"band": "RF",
"source": "antenna exposure (laboratory EMF)",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": null,
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"Yeast viability/growth",
"Yeast cell membrane integrity (TEM)"
],
"main_findings": "Exposure to electromagnetic fields between 1 and 5.9 GHz reduced yeast viability across all tested frequencies. Transmission electron microscopy indicated loss of continuity of the yeast cell membrane, and distance between the antenna and sample influenced the effect.",
"effect_direction": "harm",
"limitations": [
"Sample size not reported in abstract",
"Exposure metrics (e.g., power density, SAR) not reported in abstract",
"Exposure duration not reported in abstract",
"Yeast species/strain not specified in abstract"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.7399999999999999911182158029987476766109466552734375,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"nonionizing electromagnetic field",
"RF",
"1–5.9 GHz",
"yeast",
"food spoilage control",
"viability",
"transmission electron microscopy",
"cell membrane"
],
"suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.
Comments
Log in to comment.
No comments yet.