Share
𝕏 Facebook LinkedIn

The effects of electromagnetic field on the microstructure of seminal vesicles in rat: a light and transmission electron microscope study.

PAPER pubmed Pakistan journal of biological sciences : PJBS 2008 Animal study Effect: harm Evidence: Low

Abstract

In the industrial world, almost everyone is unavoidably exposed to ambient electromagnetic field (EMF) generated from various technical and household appliances. Controversy exists about the effects of EMF on various tissues of the living bodies. Seminal vesicles as one of these accessory glands play an important role in natural seminal fluid formation and the effects of EMF on its tissue is worthy of investigation. In order to examine this 30 rat were selected and kept for one weeks in quarantine and 15 (experimental group) were exposed to 50 Hz (non-ionizing radiation) during postnatal life for 2 months. The materials were processed and observed under a light and transmission electron microscope. In the experimental rats epithelial and basal cells showed significant destructions presented by heterochromatin and dense nuclei. Cell debris and abnormal areas was recognizable in the stromal connective tissue. Obvious vacuolization was present within the epithelial cell cytoplasm and also between the cellular organelles. The nuclei of the endothelial cells of the blood vessels were more rigid and endothelial cell cytoplasm contained a lot of vacuoles and pinoctotic vesicles. The results suggested that EMF exposure may cause profound changes in the vesicle seminal tissues. Therefore exposure to EMF may result in pathological changes that lead to sub fertility and infertility.

AI evidence extraction

At a glance
Study type
Animal study
Effect direction
harm
Population
Rats (postnatal life)
Sample size
30
Exposure
ELF · 0.05 MHz · 2 months (during postnatal life)
Evidence strength
Low
Confidence: 74% · Peer-reviewed: yes

Main findings

Fifteen rats exposed to 50 Hz EMF for 2 months showed reported microstructural/ultrastructural abnormalities in seminal vesicles, including epithelial and basal cell destruction (heterochromatin and dense nuclei), stromal cell debris/abnormal areas, epithelial cytoplasmic and inter-organelle vacuolization, and endothelial cell nuclear rigidity with vacuoles and pinocytotic vesicles. The authors conclude EMF exposure may cause profound tissue changes and may lead to subfertility/infertility.

Outcomes measured

  • Seminal vesicle microstructure (light microscopy)
  • Seminal vesicle ultrastructure (transmission electron microscopy)
  • Histopathological cellular changes in epithelial and basal cells
  • Stromal connective tissue abnormalities
  • Endothelial cell nuclear/cytoplasmic changes in blood vessels

Limitations

  • EMF source and exposure intensity/dose metrics (e.g., field strength, SAR) not reported in abstract
  • No functional fertility endpoints reported in abstract (inference to subfertility/infertility is speculative)
  • Randomization/blinding and control conditions not described in abstract
  • Small sample size per group (15 exposed; control group details not described in abstract)

Suggested hubs

  • occupational-exposure (0.2)
    Background mentions ambient EMF exposure in industrial/household settings, but the experiment is in rats and does not specify an occupational source.
View raw extracted JSON
{
    "study_type": "animal",
    "exposure": {
        "band": "ELF",
        "source": null,
        "frequency_mhz": 0.05000000000000000277555756156289135105907917022705078125,
        "sar_wkg": null,
        "duration": "2 months (during postnatal life)"
    },
    "population": "Rats (postnatal life)",
    "sample_size": 30,
    "outcomes": [
        "Seminal vesicle microstructure (light microscopy)",
        "Seminal vesicle ultrastructure (transmission electron microscopy)",
        "Histopathological cellular changes in epithelial and basal cells",
        "Stromal connective tissue abnormalities",
        "Endothelial cell nuclear/cytoplasmic changes in blood vessels"
    ],
    "main_findings": "Fifteen rats exposed to 50 Hz EMF for 2 months showed reported microstructural/ultrastructural abnormalities in seminal vesicles, including epithelial and basal cell destruction (heterochromatin and dense nuclei), stromal cell debris/abnormal areas, epithelial cytoplasmic and inter-organelle vacuolization, and endothelial cell nuclear rigidity with vacuoles and pinocytotic vesicles. The authors conclude EMF exposure may cause profound tissue changes and may lead to subfertility/infertility.",
    "effect_direction": "harm",
    "limitations": [
        "EMF source and exposure intensity/dose metrics (e.g., field strength, SAR) not reported in abstract",
        "No functional fertility endpoints reported in abstract (inference to subfertility/infertility is speculative)",
        "Randomization/blinding and control conditions not described in abstract",
        "Small sample size per group (15 exposed; control group details not described in abstract)"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "low",
    "confidence": 0.7399999999999999911182158029987476766109466552734375,
    "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
    "keywords": [
        "electromagnetic field",
        "EMF",
        "50 Hz",
        "ELF",
        "non-ionizing radiation",
        "rat",
        "seminal vesicle",
        "microstructure",
        "ultrastructure",
        "light microscopy",
        "transmission electron microscopy",
        "vacuolization",
        "endothelial cells",
        "reproductive toxicity"
    ],
    "suggested_hubs": [
        {
            "slug": "occupational-exposure",
            "weight": 0.200000000000000011102230246251565404236316680908203125,
            "reason": "Background mentions ambient EMF exposure in industrial/household settings, but the experiment is in rats and does not specify an occupational source."
        }
    ]
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract/metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.

Comments

Log in to comment.

No comments yet.