Disturbance of the immune system by electromagnetic fields-A potentially underlying cause for cellular damage and tissue repair reduction which could lead to disease and impairment.

Abstract

A number of papers dealing with the effects of modern, man-made electromagnetic fields (EMFs) on the immune system are summarized in the present review. EMFs disturb immune function through stimulation of various allergic and inflammatory responses, as well as effects on tissue repair processes. Such disturbances increase the risks for various diseases, including cancer. These and the EMF effects on other biological processes (e.g. DNA damage, neurological effects, etc.) are now widely reported to occur at exposure levels significantly below most current national and international safety limits. Obviously, biologically based exposure standards are needed to prevent disruption of normal body processes and potential adverse health effects of chronic exposure. Based on this review, as well as the reviews in the recent Bioinitiative Report [bioinitiative.org] [C.F. Blackman, M. Blank, M. Kundi, C. Sage, D.O. Carpenter, Z. Davanipour, D. Gee, L. Hardell, O. Johansson, H. Lai, K.H. Mild, A. Sage, E.L. Sobel, Z. Xu, G. Chen, The Bioinitiative Report-A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF), 2007)], it must be concluded that the existing public safety limits are inadequate to protect public health, and that new public safety limits, as well as limits on further deployment of untested technologies, are warranted.

AI evidence extraction

Main findings

This review summarizes papers reporting that modern, man-made EMFs disturb immune function via allergic and inflammatory responses and effects on tissue repair processes, potentially increasing risks for diseases including cancer. It states that such effects are reported at exposure levels below many current safety limits and concludes existing public safety limits are inadequate, advocating biologically based exposure standards and limits on further deployment of untested technologies.

Outcomes measured

• immune function disturbance
• allergic responses
• inflammatory responses
• tissue repair processes
• risk of disease (including cancer)
• DNA damage (mentioned)
• neurological effects (mentioned)

Limitations

• Narrative summary of existing papers; methods for study selection and quality appraisal are not described in the abstract.
• Specific exposure metrics (frequency, intensity/SAR) are not provided in the abstract.
• Claims about disease risk and safety limits are not tied to specific quantified results in the abstract.

Suggested hubs

• who-icnirp (0.62)
  Abstract argues current national/international safety limits are inadequate and calls for new biologically based exposure standards.

{
    "study_type": "review",
    "exposure": {
        "band": null,
        "source": "modern, man-made electromagnetic fields (EMFs)",
        "frequency_mhz": null,
        "sar_wkg": null,
        "duration": "chronic exposure (mentioned)"
    },
    "population": null,
    "sample_size": null,
    "outcomes": [
        "immune function disturbance",
        "allergic responses",
        "inflammatory responses",
        "tissue repair processes",
        "risk of disease (including cancer)",
        "DNA damage (mentioned)",
        "neurological effects (mentioned)"
    ],
    "main_findings": "This review summarizes papers reporting that modern, man-made EMFs disturb immune function via allergic and inflammatory responses and effects on tissue repair processes, potentially increasing risks for diseases including cancer. It states that such effects are reported at exposure levels below many current safety limits and concludes existing public safety limits are inadequate, advocating biologically based exposure standards and limits on further deployment of untested technologies.",
    "effect_direction": "harm",
    "limitations": [
        "Narrative summary of existing papers; methods for study selection and quality appraisal are not described in the abstract.",
        "Specific exposure metrics (frequency, intensity/SAR) are not provided in the abstract.",
        "Claims about disease risk and safety limits are not tied to specific quantified results in the abstract."
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "low",
    "confidence": 0.7399999999999999911182158029987476766109466552734375,
    "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
    "keywords": [
        "electromagnetic fields",
        "EMF",
        "immune system",
        "allergy",
        "inflammation",
        "tissue repair",
        "cancer risk",
        "safety limits",
        "Bioinitiative Report"
    ],
    "suggested_hubs": [
        {
            "slug": "who-icnirp",
            "weight": 0.61999999999999999555910790149937383830547332763671875,
            "reason": "Abstract argues current national/international safety limits are inadequate and calls for new biologically based exposure standards."
        }
    ]
}

Comments

Log in to comment.

No comments yet.