Share
𝕏 Facebook LinkedIn

High-frequency hearing loss among mobile phone users.

PAPER pubmed Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2014 Other Effect: harm Evidence: Low

Abstract

The objective of this study is to assess high frequency hearing (above 8 kHz) loss among prolonged mobile phone users is a tertiary Referral Center. Prospective single blinded study. This is the first study that used high-frequency audiometry. The wide usage of mobile phone is so profound that we were unable to find enough non-users as a control group. Therefore we compared the non-dominant ear to the dominant ear using audiometric measurements. The study was a blinded study wherein the audiologist did not know which was the dominant ear. A total of 100 subjects were studied. Of the subjects studied 53% were males and 47% females. Mean age was 27. The left ear was dominant in 63%, 22% were dominant in the right ear and 15% did not have a preference. This study showed that there is significant loss in the dominant ear compared to the non-dominant ear (P < 0.05). Chronic usage mobile phone revealed high frequency hearing loss in the dominant ear (mobile phone used) compared to the non dominant ear.

AI evidence extraction

At a glance
Study type
Other
Effect direction
harm
Population
Mobile phone users at a tertiary referral center (mean age 27; 53% male, 47% female)
Sample size
100
Exposure
RF mobile phone · prolonged/chronic usage (not further specified)
Evidence strength
Low
Confidence: 74% · Peer-reviewed: yes

Main findings

In 100 mobile phone users, high-frequency audiometry showed a statistically significant loss in the dominant ear compared with the non-dominant ear (P < 0.05). The authors interpret this as chronic mobile phone use being associated with high-frequency hearing loss in the phone-used (dominant) ear.

Outcomes measured

  • High-frequency hearing loss (>8 kHz)
  • Audiometric differences between dominant (phone-used) ear and non-dominant ear

Limitations

  • No non-user control group; comparison was within-person (dominant vs non-dominant ear)
  • Exposure duration/intensity not quantified beyond 'prolonged/chronic'
  • Frequency/SAR of mobile phone exposure not reported
View raw extracted JSON
{
    "study_type": "other",
    "exposure": {
        "band": "RF",
        "source": "mobile phone",
        "frequency_mhz": null,
        "sar_wkg": null,
        "duration": "prolonged/chronic usage (not further specified)"
    },
    "population": "Mobile phone users at a tertiary referral center (mean age 27; 53% male, 47% female)",
    "sample_size": 100,
    "outcomes": [
        "High-frequency hearing loss (>8 kHz)",
        "Audiometric differences between dominant (phone-used) ear and non-dominant ear"
    ],
    "main_findings": "In 100 mobile phone users, high-frequency audiometry showed a statistically significant loss in the dominant ear compared with the non-dominant ear (P < 0.05). The authors interpret this as chronic mobile phone use being associated with high-frequency hearing loss in the phone-used (dominant) ear.",
    "effect_direction": "harm",
    "limitations": [
        "No non-user control group; comparison was within-person (dominant vs non-dominant ear)",
        "Exposure duration/intensity not quantified beyond 'prolonged/chronic'",
        "Frequency/SAR of mobile phone exposure not reported"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "low",
    "confidence": 0.7399999999999999911182158029987476766109466552734375,
    "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
    "keywords": [
        "mobile phone",
        "RF exposure",
        "high-frequency audiometry",
        ">8 kHz",
        "hearing loss",
        "dominant ear",
        "single-blinded",
        "tertiary referral center"
    ],
    "suggested_hubs": []
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract/metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.

Comments

Log in to comment.

No comments yet.