Healthy disorders by WLAN-exposure

{
    "publication_year": 2022,
    "study_type": "case_report",
    "exposure": {
        "band": "RF",
        "source": "wifi",
        "frequency_mhz": null,
        "sar_wkg": null,
        "duration": "longtime exposure (office WLAN equipment)"
    },
    "population": "A “burn-out” patient reporting electrosensitivity; additional unspecified patients tested",
    "sample_size": null,
    "outcomes": [
        "EMG frequency components (10 Hz component/artifact)",
        "Autonomic nervous system activity (via EMG)",
        "ECG artifacts (reported in some patients)"
    ],
    "main_findings": "In an EMG-based assessment of a patient reporting electrosensitivity, the author reports a dominant artificial 10 Hz component described as similar to WLAN emitters. The abstract states that other patients tested who used this communication technology showed the same 10 Hz artifact in EMG, and some reportedly showed an artificial ECG. The author concludes these data demonstrate conflicts with ICNIRP safety guidelines for this type of exposure.",
    "effect_direction": "harm",
    "limitations": [
        "Appears to be based on a diagnostic routine/case-based observations without reported controls or blinding in the abstract",
        "Sample size and participant selection are not reported",
        "Exposure characterization (frequency, power, distance, duration) is not quantified in the abstract",
        "Outcomes described as “artifacts,” raising the possibility of measurement interference rather than physiological effects",
        "No statistical analysis or objective clinical endpoints are described in the abstract"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "low",
    "confidence": 0.61999999999999999555910790149937383830547332763671875,
    "peer_reviewed_likely": "unknown",
    "stance": "concern",
    "stance_confidence": 0.7399999999999999911182158029987476766109466552734375,
    "summary": "This case-based report describes EMG frequency analysis in a patient reporting electrosensitivity and long-term office WLAN exposure. The author reports a dominant artificial 10 Hz component in EMG, and states that similar EMG artifacts were observed in many other patients tested, with some also showing an “artificial” ECG. The abstract concludes that these observations demonstrate conflicts with ICNIRP safety guidelines for such exposures.",
    "key_points": [
        "The report centers on a patient evaluated for “burn-out” who also reported electrosensitivity.",
        "Autonomic nervous system activity was assessed using EMG, with frequency analysis of the signal.",
        "A dominant artificial 10 Hz component was reported and described as similar to WLAN emitter signals.",
        "The patient reported long-term exposure to active WLAN equipment in an office setting.",
        "The author states that many other patients tested showed the same 10 Hz EMG artifact.",
        "Some patients were also reported to show an “artificial” ECG.",
        "The abstract claims these observations conflict with ICNIRP safety guidelines for this exposure type."
    ],
    "categories": [
        "Wi-Fi",
        "Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS)",
        "Clinical case report",
        "Bioelectromagnetics"
    ],
    "tags": [
        "Wi-Fi (WLAN)",
        "Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity",
        "Electrosensitivity",
        "Electromyography (EMG)",
        "Electrocardiography (ECG)",
        "Autonomic Nervous System",
        "Signal Artifact",
        "10 Hz Component",
        "Office Exposure",
        "ICNIRP Guidelines"
    ],
    "keywords": [
        "WLAN",
        "WiFi",
        "electrosensitivity",
        "electromagnetic hypersensitivity",
        "EMG",
        "ECG",
        "autonomic nervous system",
        "10 Hz",
        "ICNIRP"
    ],
    "suggested_hubs": [
        {
            "slug": "wifi",
            "weight": 0.90000000000000002220446049250313080847263336181640625,
            "reason": "Focuses on WLAN/Wi‑Fi exposure and reported EMG/ECG artifacts."
        },
        {
            "slug": "ehs",
            "weight": 0.75,
            "reason": "Patient is described as claiming electrosensitivity and similar findings are discussed in other patients."
        }
    ],
    "social": {
        "tweet": "Case-based report: EMG frequency analysis in a patient reporting electrosensitivity found a dominant artificial 10 Hz component described as similar to WLAN signals; author reports similar EMG artifacts in other patients and suggests conflict with ICNIRP guidelines.",
        "facebook": "A case-based report describes EMG frequency analysis in a patient reporting electrosensitivity and long-term office WLAN exposure, noting a dominant artificial 10 Hz component and similar EMG artifacts in other patients; the author argues this conflicts with ICNIRP safety guidelines.",
        "linkedin": "This case-based report describes EMG frequency analysis in a patient reporting electrosensitivity and long-term office WLAN exposure, reporting a dominant artificial 10 Hz component and similar EMG artifacts in other patients, and concluding these observations conflict with ICNIRP safety guidelines."
    }
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.