Share
𝕏 Facebook LinkedIn

[Long-term exposure to low intensity microwave radiation affects male reproductivity].

PAPER pubmed Zhonghua nan ke xue = National journal of andrology 2007 Cohort study Effect: harm Evidence: Low

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of Long-term exposure to low intensity microwave radiation on male reproductivity. METHODS: A total of 289 married male radar operators were included in the radar group and 148 married men unexposed to microwave radiation were enrolled as controls. Questionnaires were used and the intensity of microwave radiation in different working areas was detected. RESULTS: The rate of sexual dysfunction was 43.6% in the radar group and 24.4% in the control group (P < 0.01). The natural pregnancy rate was 53.6% within 1 year of marriage and 46.4% after 1 year of marriage in the radar group, as compared with 81.1% and 18.9% in the control group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Long-term exposure to low intensity microwave radiation evidently increased the sexual dysfunction rate and decreased natural pregnancy rate in men.

AI evidence extraction

At a glance
Study type
Cohort study
Effect direction
harm
Population
Married male radar operators and married male controls unexposed to microwave radiation
Sample size
437
Exposure
microwave occupational (radar operators) · long-term
Evidence strength
Low
Confidence: 74% · Peer-reviewed: yes

Main findings

Sexual dysfunction was reported more often in radar operators (43.6%) than controls (24.4%) (P < 0.01). Natural pregnancy rates differed between groups: in the radar group 53.6% occurred within 1 year of marriage and 46.4% after 1 year, versus 81.1% and 18.9% in controls (P < 0.01). The authors conclude long-term low-intensity microwave exposure increased sexual dysfunction and decreased natural pregnancy rate.

Outcomes measured

  • sexual dysfunction rate
  • natural pregnancy rate (within 1 year of marriage; after 1 year of marriage)

Limitations

  • Exposure frequency and quantitative exposure metrics beyond 'intensity in different working areas' not reported in abstract
  • Outcomes appear questionnaire-based; objective clinical measures not described
  • Potential confounding factors and adjustment methods not described
  • Study design details (e.g., matching, follow-up period) not described

Suggested hubs

  • occupational-exposure (0.9)
    Study compares radar operators with unexposed controls for reproductive outcomes under occupational microwave exposure.
View raw extracted JSON
{
    "study_type": "cohort",
    "exposure": {
        "band": "microwave",
        "source": "occupational (radar operators)",
        "frequency_mhz": null,
        "sar_wkg": null,
        "duration": "long-term"
    },
    "population": "Married male radar operators and married male controls unexposed to microwave radiation",
    "sample_size": 437,
    "outcomes": [
        "sexual dysfunction rate",
        "natural pregnancy rate (within 1 year of marriage; after 1 year of marriage)"
    ],
    "main_findings": "Sexual dysfunction was reported more often in radar operators (43.6%) than controls (24.4%) (P < 0.01). Natural pregnancy rates differed between groups: in the radar group 53.6% occurred within 1 year of marriage and 46.4% after 1 year, versus 81.1% and 18.9% in controls (P < 0.01). The authors conclude long-term low-intensity microwave exposure increased sexual dysfunction and decreased natural pregnancy rate.",
    "effect_direction": "harm",
    "limitations": [
        "Exposure frequency and quantitative exposure metrics beyond 'intensity in different working areas' not reported in abstract",
        "Outcomes appear questionnaire-based; objective clinical measures not described",
        "Potential confounding factors and adjustment methods not described",
        "Study design details (e.g., matching, follow-up period) not described"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "low",
    "confidence": 0.7399999999999999911182158029987476766109466552734375,
    "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
    "keywords": [
        "microwave radiation",
        "radar operators",
        "occupational exposure",
        "male reproductivity",
        "sexual dysfunction",
        "pregnancy rate"
    ],
    "suggested_hubs": [
        {
            "slug": "occupational-exposure",
            "weight": 0.90000000000000002220446049250313080847263336181640625,
            "reason": "Study compares radar operators with unexposed controls for reproductive outcomes under occupational microwave exposure."
        }
    ]
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract/metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.

Comments

Log in to comment.

No comments yet.