Cancer in radar technicians exposed to radiofrequency/microwave radiation: sentinel episodes.
Abstract
Controversy exists concerning the health risks from exposures to radiofrequency/microwave irradiation (RF/MW). The authors report exposure-effect relationships in sentinel patients and their co-workers, who were technicians with high levels of exposure to RF/MW radiation. Information about exposures of patients with sentinel tumors was obtained from interviews, medical records, and technical sources. One patient was a member of a cohort of 25 workers with six tumors. The authors estimated relative risks for cancer in this group and latency periods for a larger group of self-reported individuals. Index patients with melanoma of the eye, testicular cancer, nasopharyngioma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and breast cancer were in the 20-37-year age group. Information about work conditions suggested prolonged exposures to high levels of RF/MW radiation that produced risks for the entire body. Clusters involved many different types of tumors. Latency periods were extremely brief in index patients and a larger self-reported group. The findings suggest that young persons exposed to high levels of RF/MW radiation for long periods in settings where preventive measures were lax were at increased risk for cancer. Very short latency periods suggest high risks from high-level exposures. Calculations derived from a linear model of dose-response suggest the need to prevent exposures in the range of 10-100 microw/cm(2).
AI evidence extraction
Main findings
The authors describe clusters of multiple tumor types among radar technicians reported to have prolonged high-level RF/microwave exposures, including a cohort of 25 workers with six tumors. They report estimated relative risks for cancer in this group and describe very short latency periods in index patients and a larger self-reported group, concluding that high-level long-duration exposures in settings with lax preventive measures were associated with increased cancer risk and suggesting prevention of exposures in the range of 10–100 microw/cm(2).
Outcomes measured
- Cancer incidence/tumors
- Latency period
Limitations
- Exposure information was obtained from interviews, medical records, and technical sources (potential for recall/measurement uncertainty).
- Includes sentinel cases/clusters and a larger self-reported group (potential selection/reporting bias).
- Frequency and SAR not reported in the abstract.
- Study design details and quantitative risk estimates are not provided in the abstract.
Suggested hubs
-
occupational-exposure
(0.9) Focuses on radar technicians with high occupational RF/microwave exposure and cancer outcomes.
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "other",
"exposure": {
"band": "RF",
"source": "occupational (radar technicians)",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "prolonged exposures to high levels (long periods)"
},
"population": "Radar technicians (sentinel patients and co-workers); also a larger self-reported group",
"sample_size": 25,
"outcomes": [
"Cancer incidence/tumors",
"Latency period"
],
"main_findings": "The authors describe clusters of multiple tumor types among radar technicians reported to have prolonged high-level RF/microwave exposures, including a cohort of 25 workers with six tumors. They report estimated relative risks for cancer in this group and describe very short latency periods in index patients and a larger self-reported group, concluding that high-level long-duration exposures in settings with lax preventive measures were associated with increased cancer risk and suggesting prevention of exposures in the range of 10–100 microw/cm(2).",
"effect_direction": "harm",
"limitations": [
"Exposure information was obtained from interviews, medical records, and technical sources (potential for recall/measurement uncertainty).",
"Includes sentinel cases/clusters and a larger self-reported group (potential selection/reporting bias).",
"Frequency and SAR not reported in the abstract.",
"Study design details and quantitative risk estimates are not provided in the abstract."
],
"evidence_strength": "very_low",
"confidence": 0.66000000000000003108624468950438313186168670654296875,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"radar technicians",
"occupational exposure",
"radiofrequency",
"microwave radiation",
"cancer",
"tumor clusters",
"latency",
"dose-response",
"microw/cm2"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "occupational-exposure",
"weight": 0.90000000000000002220446049250313080847263336181640625,
"reason": "Focuses on radar technicians with high occupational RF/microwave exposure and cancer outcomes."
}
]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.
Comments
Log in to comment.
No comments yet.