Microwave radiation and heart-beat rate of rabbits.
Abstract
Each of three adult New Zealand rabbits, 2 male and 1 female albinos, was exposed dorsally or ventrally, to 2450-MHz plane waves for 20 min under each of several field conditions: 1) to continuous waves (CW) at 5 mW/cm2; 2) to pulsed waves (PW) of 1-microsecond width that recurred 700 pps at an average of 5 mW/cm2 and at a peak of 7.1 W/cm2; 3) to PW of 10-microseconds width at a peak of 13.7 W/cm2 that were synchronized with and triggered by the R wave of the electrocardiogram (EKG) at various delay times (0, 100, and 200 ms; and 4) to CW at 80 mW/cm2. Carbon-loaded Teflon electrodes were used to record the EKG from forelimbs of an animal before, during, and after irradiation whilst it was maintained in a constant exposure geometry in a wooden squeeze box. Field induced changes in the heart-beat rate were observed at 80 mW/cm2 but not a lower average power densities, although a peak positive chronotropic effect might have been occasioned by PM introduced at 100 and 200 ms after the R wave peak. No cumulative effect was observed over a period of four months. Thermographic analysis revealed relatively little absorption of microwave energy by the myocardium irrespective of anatomical aspect of exposure.
AI evidence extraction
Main findings
Field-induced changes in heart-beat rate were observed at 80 mW/cm2 continuous-wave exposure but not at lower average power densities (5 mW/cm2). The authors note a possible peak positive chronotropic effect with pulsed microwaves triggered 100 and 200 ms after the R wave. No cumulative effect was observed over four months, and thermography suggested relatively little myocardial absorption regardless of exposure aspect.
Outcomes measured
- heart-beat rate
- electrocardiogram (EKG)
- myocardial microwave energy absorption (thermographic analysis)
Limitations
- Very small sample size (n=3)
- Animal study; generalizability to humans unclear
- Some findings described as possible (uncertain) rather than definitive
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "animal",
"exposure": {
"band": "microwave",
"source": null,
"frequency_mhz": 2450,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "20 min"
},
"population": "Adult New Zealand rabbits (2 male, 1 female albinos)",
"sample_size": 3,
"outcomes": [
"heart-beat rate",
"electrocardiogram (EKG)",
"myocardial microwave energy absorption (thermographic analysis)"
],
"main_findings": "Field-induced changes in heart-beat rate were observed at 80 mW/cm2 continuous-wave exposure but not at lower average power densities (5 mW/cm2). The authors note a possible peak positive chronotropic effect with pulsed microwaves triggered 100 and 200 ms after the R wave. No cumulative effect was observed over four months, and thermography suggested relatively little myocardial absorption regardless of exposure aspect.",
"effect_direction": "mixed",
"limitations": [
"Very small sample size (n=3)",
"Animal study; generalizability to humans unclear",
"Some findings described as possible (uncertain) rather than definitive"
],
"evidence_strength": "very_low",
"confidence": 0.7399999999999999911182158029987476766109466552734375,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"rabbit",
"microwave radiation",
"2450 MHz",
"continuous wave",
"pulsed wave",
"power density",
"heart rate",
"chronotropic effect",
"electrocardiogram",
"thermography"
],
"suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.
Comments
Log in to comment.
No comments yet.