Share
𝕏 Facebook LinkedIn

Bradycardia-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia after radiofrequency catheter modification of atrioventricular junction.

PAPER pubmed Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing 1997 Case report Effect: harm Evidence: Very low

Abstract

We report the case of a 59-year-old man with a dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy who had chronic rapid atrial fibrillation despite several therapies. Radiofrequency modification of the atrioventricular (AV) junction slowed the mean ventricular rate from 120 beats per minute (bpm) to 60 bpm. Five hours after the procedure and during the following 1 week, despite ventricular pacing at 90 bpm, the patient developed nonsustained or sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardias. Finally, pacing at 90 bpm was successfully used in this patient. In conclusion, patients who have undergone modification of AV conduction may be at high risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in the first week following the procedure.

AI evidence extraction

At a glance
Study type
Case report
Effect direction
harm
Population
59-year-old man with dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy and chronic rapid atrial fibrillation
Sample size
1
Exposure
radiofrequency catheter modification of atrioventricular junction
Evidence strength
Very low
Confidence: 74% · Peer-reviewed: yes

Main findings

After radiofrequency modification of the AV junction reduced mean ventricular rate from 120 bpm to 60 bpm, the patient developed nonsustained or sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardias starting 5 hours post-procedure and during the following week, despite ventricular pacing at 90 bpm. The authors conclude there may be a high risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in the first week after AV conduction modification.

Outcomes measured

  • Bradycardia-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
  • Nonsustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
  • Sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
  • Ventricular rate change after AV junction modification
  • Need for ventricular pacing

Limitations

  • Single-patient case report
  • No quantitative exposure parameters (e.g., RF frequency, power, lesion details) reported in abstract
  • No control/comparator group
View raw extracted JSON
{
    "study_type": "case_report",
    "exposure": {
        "band": null,
        "source": "radiofrequency catheter modification of atrioventricular junction",
        "frequency_mhz": null,
        "sar_wkg": null,
        "duration": null
    },
    "population": "59-year-old man with dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy and chronic rapid atrial fibrillation",
    "sample_size": 1,
    "outcomes": [
        "Bradycardia-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia",
        "Nonsustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia",
        "Sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia",
        "Ventricular rate change after AV junction modification",
        "Need for ventricular pacing"
    ],
    "main_findings": "After radiofrequency modification of the AV junction reduced mean ventricular rate from 120 bpm to 60 bpm, the patient developed nonsustained or sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardias starting 5 hours post-procedure and during the following week, despite ventricular pacing at 90 bpm. The authors conclude there may be a high risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in the first week after AV conduction modification.",
    "effect_direction": "harm",
    "limitations": [
        "Single-patient case report",
        "No quantitative exposure parameters (e.g., RF frequency, power, lesion details) reported in abstract",
        "No control/comparator group"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "very_low",
    "confidence": 0.7399999999999999911182158029987476766109466552734375,
    "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
    "keywords": [
        "radiofrequency catheter modification",
        "atrioventricular junction",
        "atrial fibrillation",
        "bradycardia",
        "polymorphic ventricular tachycardia",
        "ventricular pacing",
        "cardiomyopathy"
    ],
    "suggested_hubs": []
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract/metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.

Comments

Log in to comment.

No comments yet.