Share
𝕏 Facebook LinkedIn

Effect of Occupational Exposure to Low-frequency Electromagnetic Fields on Cataract Development

PAPER manual Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research 2025 Cross-sectional study Effect: harm Evidence: Low

Abstract

Category: Epidemiology Institution: Zahedan Electricity Company Tags: low-frequency electromagnetic fields, occupational exposure, cataract, eye health, power lines, visual impairment, epidemiology DOI: 10.18502/jovr.v20.12281 URL: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Overview ⚡ Purpose: Cataracts are the second leading cause of visual impairment worldwide. This study aimed to examine the impact of occupational exposure to low-frequency electromagnetic fields on cataract development. Methods - 100 employees of Zahedan Electricity Company were enrolled. - Participants assigned to four groups: regular, operational, operator personnel (all exposed), and non-exposure. - LOCS III grading system used to evaluate risk for different cataract types: nuclear, posterior subcapsular, and cortical. Findings - 👁 Cataract frequency: 62.2% in the exposure group vs 53.8% in the non-exposure group. - Significant difference observed for nuclear opacity grading (P = 0.003). - 💡 Correlation found: Nuclear and posterior subcapsular cataract grades were significantly associated with longer work experience in the exposure group (P < 0.018). Conclusion 🚩 This study's findings indicate that occupational exposure to low-frequency electromagnetic fields, such as those found near power lines, power plants, and distribution posts, may be a risk factor for cataract development, especially nuclear cataracts.

AI evidence extraction

At a glance
Study type
Cross-sectional study
Effect direction
harm
Population
Employees of Zahedan Electricity Company
Sample size
100
Exposure
ELF occupational · longer work experience (duration not quantified)
Evidence strength
Low
Confidence: 74% · Peer-reviewed: yes

Main findings

Among 100 electricity company employees grouped by exposure status, cataract frequency was 62.2% in the exposure group versus 53.8% in the non-exposure group. A significant difference was reported for nuclear opacity grading (P=0.003), and nuclear and posterior subcapsular cataract grades were significantly associated with longer work experience in the exposure group (P<0.018).

Outcomes measured

  • Cataract frequency/prevalence
  • Nuclear cataract (nuclear opacity grading; LOCS III)
  • Posterior subcapsular cataract grading (LOCS III)
  • Cortical cataract grading (LOCS III)

Limitations

  • Exposure metrics (field strength, frequency, or dosimetry) not reported in the abstract
  • Study design appears observational/cross-sectional, limiting causal inference
  • Potential confounding factors and adjustment methods not described in the abstract
  • Group sizes and exact definitions of exposure categories not provided in the abstract

Suggested hubs

  • occupational-exposure (0.95)
    Study examines occupational low-frequency EMF exposure among electricity company employees and cataract outcomes.
View raw extracted JSON
{
    "study_type": "cross_sectional",
    "exposure": {
        "band": "ELF",
        "source": "occupational",
        "frequency_mhz": null,
        "sar_wkg": null,
        "duration": "longer work experience (duration not quantified)"
    },
    "population": "Employees of Zahedan Electricity Company",
    "sample_size": 100,
    "outcomes": [
        "Cataract frequency/prevalence",
        "Nuclear cataract (nuclear opacity grading; LOCS III)",
        "Posterior subcapsular cataract grading (LOCS III)",
        "Cortical cataract grading (LOCS III)"
    ],
    "main_findings": "Among 100 electricity company employees grouped by exposure status, cataract frequency was 62.2% in the exposure group versus 53.8% in the non-exposure group. A significant difference was reported for nuclear opacity grading (P=0.003), and nuclear and posterior subcapsular cataract grades were significantly associated with longer work experience in the exposure group (P<0.018).",
    "effect_direction": "harm",
    "limitations": [
        "Exposure metrics (field strength, frequency, or dosimetry) not reported in the abstract",
        "Study design appears observational/cross-sectional, limiting causal inference",
        "Potential confounding factors and adjustment methods not described in the abstract",
        "Group sizes and exact definitions of exposure categories not provided in the abstract"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "low",
    "confidence": 0.7399999999999999911182158029987476766109466552734375,
    "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
    "keywords": [
        "low-frequency electromagnetic fields",
        "ELF",
        "occupational exposure",
        "cataract",
        "nuclear cataract",
        "posterior subcapsular cataract",
        "LOCS III",
        "power lines",
        "power plants",
        "distribution posts",
        "eye health",
        "epidemiology"
    ],
    "suggested_hubs": [
        {
            "slug": "occupational-exposure",
            "weight": 0.9499999999999999555910790149937383830547332763671875,
            "reason": "Study examines occupational low-frequency EMF exposure among electricity company employees and cataract outcomes."
        }
    ]
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract/metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.

Comments

Log in to comment.

No comments yet.