In-Situ Measurements of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields Measurements Around 5G Macro Base Stations in the UK

Abstract

Category: Environmental Health/Exposure Assessment Tags: 5G, radiofrequency, electromagnetic fields, power density, base stations, United Kingdom, exposure assessment DOI: 10.1002/bem.70012 URL: onlinelibrary.wiley.com Overview This study conducted radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic field spot measurements in line-of-sight to 56 active 5G macro base stations across 30 publicly accessible locations within the United Kingdom (UK). - Four different exposure scenarios were assessed: - Background (no traffic instigation) - Streaming videos - Downlink speed test - Extrapolation of SS-RSRP decoder measurements - Power density measurements were performed across the 420 MHz–6 GHz frequency range at each site to assess total exposure from various RF sources present in the environment. Findings - Both total RF and 5G-specific power density levels were found to be well within the 1998 ICNIRP public reference levels, even when extrapolating to worst-case scenario (= 5%). - 4G downlink was identified as the dominant contributor to total RF exposure, with 5G contributing on average less than 10%. - No statistically significant difference was observed between beamforming and non-beamforming sites. - Streaming did not appear to materially contribute to exposure levels, indicating that background measurements reflect typical downlink exposure at current urban and suburban 5G sites. Conclusion The study underscores the importance of monitoring and reporting on environmental exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs), as continuous assessment helps to inform public health guidelines and understand potential health risks, particularly with expanding 5G infrastructure.

AI evidence extraction

Main findings

Spot measurements in line-of-sight to 56 active 5G macro base stations at 30 UK public locations found total RF and 5G-specific power density levels well within the 1998 ICNIRP public reference levels, including extrapolation to a stated worst-case scenario. 4G downlink was the dominant contributor to total RF exposure, with 5G contributing on average less than 10%, and no statistically significant difference was observed between beamforming and non-beamforming sites; streaming did not materially change exposure compared with background.

Outcomes measured

• Total RF power density
• 5G-specific power density
• Contribution of 4G vs 5G to total RF exposure
• Difference in power density between beamforming vs non-beamforming sites
• Effect of streaming/downlink activity on measured exposure

Suggested hubs

• 5g-policy (0.86)
  In-situ exposure measurements around 5G macro base stations with comparison to ICNIRP public reference levels.
• who-icnirp (0.74)
  Findings explicitly benchmark measured power density against 1998 ICNIRP public reference levels.

{
    "study_type": "exposure_assessment",
    "exposure": {
        "band": "RF",
        "source": "base station",
        "frequency_mhz": null,
        "sar_wkg": null,
        "duration": null
    },
    "population": null,
    "sample_size": 56,
    "outcomes": [
        "Total RF power density",
        "5G-specific power density",
        "Contribution of 4G vs 5G to total RF exposure",
        "Difference in power density between beamforming vs non-beamforming sites",
        "Effect of streaming/downlink activity on measured exposure"
    ],
    "main_findings": "Spot measurements in line-of-sight to 56 active 5G macro base stations at 30 UK public locations found total RF and 5G-specific power density levels well within the 1998 ICNIRP public reference levels, including extrapolation to a stated worst-case scenario. 4G downlink was the dominant contributor to total RF exposure, with 5G contributing on average less than 10%, and no statistically significant difference was observed between beamforming and non-beamforming sites; streaming did not materially change exposure compared with background.",
    "effect_direction": "no_effect",
    "limitations": [],
    "evidence_strength": "low",
    "confidence": 0.7800000000000000266453525910037569701671600341796875,
    "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
    "keywords": [
        "5G",
        "radiofrequency",
        "electromagnetic fields",
        "power density",
        "base stations",
        "United Kingdom",
        "exposure assessment",
        "ICNIRP",
        "beamforming",
        "4G"
    ],
    "suggested_hubs": [
        {
            "slug": "5g-policy",
            "weight": 0.85999999999999998667732370449812151491641998291015625,
            "reason": "In-situ exposure measurements around 5G macro base stations with comparison to ICNIRP public reference levels."
        },
        {
            "slug": "who-icnirp",
            "weight": 0.7399999999999999911182158029987476766109466552734375,
            "reason": "Findings explicitly benchmark measured power density against 1998 ICNIRP public reference levels."
        }
    ]
}

Comments

Log in to comment.

No comments yet.