Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure on cancer in laboratory animal studies, a systematic review
This systematic review evaluated RF-EMF exposure and cancer outcomes in experimental animals, including 52 studies (20 chronic cancer bioassays), using narrative synthesis due to substantial heterogeneity. The review reports no or minimal evidence of RF-EMF-related cancer outcomes for many organ systems, but reports high certainty of evidence for increased glioma and malignant heart schwannomas in male rats based on chronic bioassays. The review also reports moderate certainty of evidence for lymphoma, adrenal pheochromocytoma, hepatoblastoma, and lung neoplasms.
Key points
- The review included 52 animal studies, including 20 chronic cancer bioassays, and did not exclude studies based on risk-of-bias concerns.
- Meta-analysis was not performed because studies were heterogeneous across design, species/strain/sex, exposure characteristics, and outcomes.
- Most organ systems showed no or minimal evidence of RF-EMF exposure-related cancer outcomes in the included studies.
- For brain tumors, two chronic bioassays in male rats reported increased glial cell-derived neoplasms, with high certainty of evidence for increased glioma.
- For heart neoplasms, two bioassays reported statistically significant increases in malignant schwannomas in male rats, with high certainty of evidence.
- Moderate certainty of evidence was reported for lymphoma, with inconsistency between two chronic bioassays not plausibly explainable.
- Moderate certainty of evidence was reported for adrenal pheochromocytoma, but findings were not dose-dependent compared with sham controls.
- Moderate certainty of evidence was also reported for hepatoblastomas and for lung neoplasms, including one chronic bioassay with a statistically significant positive trend.
Referenced studies & papers
Relevant papers in OpenMel
Source:
Open original
AI-generated summaries may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.
AI-generated summaries may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.
Comments
Log in to comment.
No comments yet.