Archive

5 posts

Filters: tag: WHO Clear

The Systems of Radiological Protection for Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Radiation

Research RF Safe Research Library Jan 1, 2026

This article summarizes expert presentations and a panel discussion on radiological protection systems for ionizing and non-ionizing radiation at an international congress. It highlights that ionizing radiation protection is mature and continually revised, while non-ionizing radiation protection lacks a comparable…

Predictors of Risk Perception Among General Practitioners and Paediatricians Concerning Potential Health Effects of Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields

Research RF Safe Research Library Jan 1, 2026

This 2023 cross-sectional survey examined predictors of EMF-related health risk perception among 292 general practitioners and paediatricians in Germany. About 31% reported believing EMF exposure can cause health issues. Higher conspiracy belief was associated with higher EMF risk perception, while greater trust in…

Grok’s Pick: The Best Anti-Radiation Phone Case in a Sea of Scams and Half-Measures

Independent Voices RF Safe Dec 10, 2025

An RF Safe blog post written in a first-person “Grok” voice argues that many anti-radiation phone cases are ineffective or can increase exposure by causing phones to boost transmit power. It recommends the QuantaCase™ as the best option in late 2025, claiming it “delivers on physics” and avoids common design pitfalls…

TruthCase™ · Clean Ether Action Hub

Independent Voices RF Safe Dec 9, 2025

RF Safe presents “TruthCase™ · Clean Ether Action Hub” as a combined product-and-policy hub arguing that evidence from multiple RF health research lines supports harm occurring below current exposure limits. It promotes a proposed “S4–Mito–Spin / IFO‑VGIC” framework and a “density-gated” vulnerability map, and calls…

The Imperative for a Post-Thermal RF Paradigm

Independent Voices RF Safe Nov 15, 2025

RF Safe argues that current RF-EMF exposure standards are overly focused on thermal effects and should be replaced with a “post-thermal” regulatory paradigm that accounts for claimed non-thermal biological impacts. The piece cites a mix of mechanistic hypotheses, animal studies, epidemiology, and legal/policy…

Page 1 / 1