Archive

8 posts

Filters: tag: RF shielding Clear

RF Safe’s QuantaCase (also known as TruthCase)

Resources RF Safe Jan 16, 2026

RF Safe promotes its QuantaCase (also called TruthCase) as a leading “anti-radiation” phone case for 2026, emphasizing a directional shielding design intended to deflect RF energy away from the body. The article argues the product aligns with consumer-safety guidance such as keeping phones away from the body and…

The Anti‑Radiation Phone Case Market Runs on Percentages. RF Safe Refuses to Sell One.

Independent Voices RF Safe Jan 16, 2026

RF Safe critiques the anti-radiation phone case market for relying on headline percentage-blocking claims that may reflect tests of shielding material rather than real-world phone behavior in a case on a live network. The article argues that poorly designed or misused shielding cases can interfere with a phone’s…

Why RF Safe’s TruthCase Refuses the “99% Blocking” Game — and Why That’s the Point

Independent Voices RF Safe Jan 16, 2026

RF Safe argues that “anti-radiation” phone case marketing based on universal “99% blocking” claims is misleading because real-world phone emissions vary with signal conditions, orientation, and how a case affects the antenna. The post positions RF Safe’s TruthCase/QuantaCase as more credible specifically because it…

Best Anti‑Radiation Phone Case 2026: Why QuantaCase (RF Safe) Is the Stand‑Out Choice

Resources RF Safe Jan 3, 2026

RF Safe argues that many “anti-radiation” phone cases use misleading marketing (e.g., fabric-swatch tests, vague “FCC tested” claims) and that some designs may cause phones to increase transmit power if they interfere with antennas. The article provides a checklist of red flags (magnets/metal plates, detachable…

Best Anti-Radiation Phone Case 2026: Why QuantaCase is the Only Truthful Choice in a Sea of Scams

Independent Voices RF Safe Dec 11, 2025

RF Safe promotes its QuantaCase as the only “truthful” anti-radiation phone case and argues that many competing shielding cases use misleading “percent blocking” claims and can sometimes increase user exposure depending on design and phone behavior. The post mixes product marketing with broader claims about RF-EMF…

Why Percentage Claims in Anti-Radiation Phone Cases Are Deceptive: The Truth Behind RF Shielding

Independent Voices RF Safe Dec 11, 2025

RF Safe argues that common marketing claims for anti-radiation phone cases (e.g., “99% shielding”) are misleading because they often rely on controlled lab fabric tests that do not reflect real-world phone use. The post claims factors like shield orientation, phone transmit-power increases under obstruction,…

QuantaCase: A Physics-First Tool for Precautionary RF Exposure Reduction in Phone Cases

Resources RF Safe Dec 10, 2025

RF Safe promotes QuantaCase (also marketed as TruthCase) as an “anti-radiation” phone case designed to deflect RF energy away from the user while maintaining phone performance. The article argues that non-thermal biological effects can occur below current exposure guidelines and cites multiple reviews and reports to…

RF Shielded Hat for Protecting Cameraman from EMF Exposure

Research RF Safe Research Library Jan 1, 2014

The paper describes the development of RF-shielded hats using a microwave absorbing sheet intended to reduce EMF exposure to a cameraman’s head. Three hat designs are described, and measurements are planned/performed in an anechoic chamber using a wireless video camera operating around 1.9–2.7 GHz, including a 2.45…

Page 1 / 1