Archive
2 postsThe Herzification / Bioelectric Fidelity Hypothesis
RF Safe presents the “Herzification / Bioelectric Fidelity Hypothesis,” arguing that modern RF/EMF exposure has rapidly altered the human electromagnetic environment and may degrade biological electrical signaling (“bioelectric fidelity”). The post frames this as an “evidence-anchored hypothesis” that could help explain a wide range of outcomes (e.g., cancer, infertility, ADHD-like traits, some autism phenotypes, emotional dysregulation), while acknowledging it is not definitive proof. It also cites Heinrich Hertz’s illness as a suggestive historical anecdote and references proposed non-thermal interaction mechanisms involving voltage-gated ion channels.
Magnetoreception and the ruling hypothesis
This article is a commentary on how emotions and community dynamics can bias scientific reasoning when a favored hypothesis becomes a "ruling hypothesis." Using animal magnetoreception as an example, it argues that radical-pair/cryptochrome-centered frameworks may sometimes be treated as dominant, potentially leading to selective interpretation of evidence. The authors call for separating individual intent from community-wide bias and offer recommendations to mitigate these risks.