RF Safe argues that an acute laboratory finding—reported as increased ad-libitum energy intake after brief 3G handset exposure versus sham—supports its proposed “S4 Timing Fidelity” mechanism for non-thermal RF effects. The post links the behavioral outcome to hypothalamic energy-sensing and autonomic changes via voltage-gated ion channel (VGIC) gating perturbations, and further connects this to mitochondrial/oxidative phosphorylation signaling. It also frames electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) as a sensitivity phenotype and proposes testable predictions involving pulse structure and physiological correlates (e.g., HRV, EEG).

This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study tested whether CACNA1C rs7304986 genotype modifies sleep EEG responses to 5G RF-EMF exposure. The authors report a genotype-by-exposure interaction, with 3.6 GHz exposure in T/C carriers associated with a faster NREM sleep spindle center frequency versus sham. The abstract also notes longer sleep latency in T/C compared with T/T carriers, and concludes that genetically susceptible groups may show differential physiological responses to 5G RF-EMF.

This review examines links between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields, especially the Schumann resonance at ~7.83 Hz, and biological regulation of bioelectricity. It describes proposed mechanisms involving calcium flux modulation and downstream effects on neural activity (including EEG) and circadian rhythms. The article presents both potential benefits from controlled ELF exposures (e.g., therapeutic applications) and potential harms from artificial EMFs disrupting key physiological processes, while emphasizing the need for further research.

This scoping review evaluates evidence on mobile phone electromagnetic exposure and its effects on brain oscillations and cortical excitability in healthy individuals. Across 78 EEG studies (and 2 TMS studies), the authors report that exposure may be linked to changes in neural activity, including increased amplitudes in several EEG bands and possible changes in cortical silent period. However, substantial methodological inconsistency across studies limits firm conclusions, and the review highlights limited evidence for 5G/mmWave exposures and argues for precaution and potential guideline revision.